interesting experiment which illustrated this. The belief that another bystander in the group will offer help. Diffusion of responsibility occurs when people who need to make a decision wait for someone else to act instead. Two main factors come into play in the bystander effect. decision model and involves evaluating the consequences of helping or not helping. As the size of the group increases, it’s generally less likely that an individual will take any action. Synthese (Dordrecht), 191(11), 2471-2498. 1, pp. Bystander effect and diffusion of responsibility. The bystander effect is a specific type of diffusion of responsibility—when people's responses to certain situations depend on the presence of others. On the morning of March 13, 1964, Kitty Genovese returned to her apartment complex, at 3 am, after finishing her shift at a local bar. Individuals tend to stand by and watch assuming someone else will help, which is why diffusion of responsibility is known as the bystander effect. One of the problems with bystanders in emergency situations is the ability to split the responsibility (diffusion of responsibility). One of them is called the diffusion of responsibility. Pluralistic ignorance operates under the assumption that all the other bystanders are also going through these eleven steps. These two systems work in opposition; whichever overrides the other determines the action that will be taken. Van Bommel, Marco, Van Prooijen, Jan-Willem, Elffers, Henk, & Van Lange, Paul A.M. (2012). This could be a few things like charging into the situation or calling the police, but in pluralistic ignorance, Bystander A chooses to understand more about the situation by looking around and taking in the reactions of others. Research suggests that in emergency situations where a victim will suffer greatly if help is not forthcoming, bystanders relieve themselves of responsibility by asking “experts,” such as firefighters or paramedics, for assistance, thus indirectly helping. 10, 215–221. Simply Psychology. Bystander intervention and diffusion of responsibility are two terms that are explained in depth in this documentary. If the student did not get help after six minutes, the experiment was cut off. This kind of group behavior led to such crimes against humanity as the Nazi Holocaust. Bystander A now believes that there is no emergency. Diffusion of the responsibility to help is increased when others who are viewed as more capable of helping (e.g., a doctor or police officer) are present. var domainroot="www.simplypsychology.org" In response to these claims, Darley and Latané set out to find an alternative explanation. However, the decision model does not provide a complete picture. Individuals may feel afraid of being superseded by a superior helper, offering unwanted assistance, or facing the legal consequences of offering inferior and possibly dangerous assistance. present in an emergency situation. The Famous Game Show Problem. A course of action is taken. American Psychologist, 62, 555-562. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 308 –324. Psychologists have found that people are sometimes less likely to help out when there are others present, a phenomenon known as the bystander effect. hesitant about showing anxiety, so they looked to others for signs of anxiety. Diffusion of responsibility refers to the fact that as the number of bystanders increases, the personal responsibility that an individual bystander feels decreases. Bystander A has another opportunity to help. self-satisfaction derived from the act of helping. May 23, 2017 May 23, 2017 Rishu Shukla. When other observers fail to react, individuals often take this as a signal that a response is not needed or not appro… It the overt reactions of others when defining an ambiguous situation). Each participant would speak one at a time into a microphone. Research has shown that the presence of others can cause diffusion of the responsibility to help. believe that the incident does not require their personal responsibility. College students were ushered into a solitary room under the impression that a conversation centered around learning in a “high stress, high urban environment” would ensue. after people have originally interpreted the event as an emergency. (1968). Thus, when an emergency occurs, the social context can be a powerful determinant of bystanders’ decision to intervene. They noticed that less activity occurred in the regions that facilitate helping: the pre- and postcentral gyrus and the medial prefrontal cortex (Hortensius et al., 2018). decision model of helping, Help in a crisis: Bystander response to of this type, Latané & Darley (1968) asked participants to sit on their own in a room and complete a Decide to help (or worry about danger, legislation, embarrassment, etc.). When only one bystander is present in an emergency, if help is to come, it must come from him. The bystander effect (or bystander apathy) is a multifaceted social psychological phenomenon depicting that there is a lesser chance of an individual intervening and helping in an emergency if there are other bystanders present (Hogg and Vaughan, 2014). The Diffusion of Responsibility. The more people involved, the more likely it is that each person will do nothing, believing someone else from the group will probably respond. Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. How to Write a Great Novel. Be on the lookout for your Britannica newsletter to get trusted stories delivered right to your inbox. Latané´, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). It is recognised that costs may be (1969, 1981) put forward the cost–reward arousal model as a major alternative to the It is the ambiguity and uncertainty which leads to incorrect perceptions that categorize pluralistic ignorance. The blame for not helping can be shared instead of resting on only one person. Following this, the assailant appeared to have left, but once the lights from the apartments turned off, the perpetrator returned and stabbed Kitty Genovese again. Latané and Darley (1970) identified three different psychological processes that might prevent a bystander from helping a person in distress: (i) diffusion of responsibility; (ii) evaluation apprehension (fear of being publically judged); and (iii) pluralistic ignorance (the tendency to rely on Thus, these researchers argue that the decision to help is not “reflective” but “reflexive” (Hortensius et al., 2018). By casting doubt on the original case, the implications of the Darley and Latané research are also questioned. The bystander effect is when the group is waiting for a leader to step forward, but no one would ever be assigned because it isn't a premade group, it just happens to be a group of people. The Kitty Genovese murder and the social psychology of helping: The parable of the 38 witnesses. While the bystander effect has become a cemented theory in social psychology, the original account of the murder of Catherine Genovese has been called into question. account of emotional factors such as anxiety or fear, nor does it focus on why people do help; it mainly Prentice, D. (2007). The Bystander Effect: Diffusion of Responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 926-930. var idcomments_acct = '911e7834fec70b58e57f0a4156665d56'; misinterpreted the situation and redefined it as ‘safe’. Thus, in the third step of the bystander decision-making process, diffusion of responsibility rather than social influence is the process underlying the bystander effect. This experiment is based off of the experiment by Darley and Latane and the Kitty Genovese murder. eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'simplypsychology_org-medrectangle-1','ezslot_14',199,'0','0']));report this ad, eval(ez_write_tag([[300,600],'simplypsychology_org-box-1','ezslot_5',197,'0','0']));report this ad, Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility, Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies, Ten years of research on group size and helping. (2012) the negative account of the consequences of the bystander effect undermines the potential positives. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Croft. within six minutes when the experiment ended. Bystander A chooses not to help because of the belief that there is not an emergency. In interviews afterwards, participants reported feeling //Enter domain of site to search. The costs of helping include effort, time, loss of resources, risk of harm, and negative The bystander effect, or bystander apathy, is a social psychological theory that states that individuals are less likely to offer help to a victim when there are other people present. to donate a kidney to a relative. Pluralistic ignorance in the bystander effect: Informational dynamics of unresponsive witnesses in situations calling for intervention. Considered a form of attribution, the… eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'simplypsychology_org-banner-1','ezslot_9',121,'0','0'])); Three times as many men intervened in Psychology, 8, 377–383. concentrates on why people don’t help. The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? The diffusion of responsibility is the social psychology phenomenon that individuals are less likely to take action when a larger number of people are present. Although primarily developed to explain emergency situations, it Formally, the bystander effect states that people are less likely to help in an emergency situation when there are other bystanders present (Gruman, Schneider, & Coutts, 2012). Where other mechanisms such as social and cultural circumstances play in to the overall outcome of a situation entirely. However, they Latané, B., & Nida, S. (1981). For example, in a library patrons are expected to be quiet and in a classroom students may speak up in a respectful and orderly way, but at a party people may be much less inhibited. Whether one helps or not depends on the outcome of weighing up both the costs and rewards of Individuals may decide not to intervene in critical situations if they are afraid of being superseded by a superior helper, offering unwanted assistance, or facing the legal consequences of offering inferior and possibly dangerous assistance. I have provided a link below that discusses ten notorious cases of the bystander effect. Studies have shown that when there are a greater amount of witnesses to an emergency the less likely people will offer to help. Ten years of research on group size and helping. eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'simplypsychology_org-leader-1','ezslot_15',142,'0','0'])); The rewards of helping include fame, gratitude from the victim and relatives, and Know what to do (or not have the skills necessary to help). In groups of three participants, 62 percent carried on Priming occurs when a person is given cues that will influence future actions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, She plans to major in Neuroscience with a minor in Psychology. Bystanders are less likely to intervene in emergency situations as the size of the group increases, as they feel One example is confusion of responsibility. Latane and Darley attributed the bystander effect to the perceived Diffusion of Responsibility, which suggests that onlooker are less likely to intervene if … The other is our desire to conform and follow the actions of others. found that simply thinking of being in a group could lead to lower rates of helping in emergency situations. Thus, they all choose to not help due to the misperception of others' reactions to the same situation. Tagged: Bystander Effect, Kitty Genovese. The bystander must notice that something is amiss. The second process is evaluation apprehension, which refers to the fear of being judged by others when acting After parking her car in a lot adjacent to her apartment building, she began walking the short distance to the entrance, which was located at the back of the building. But bystanders diffuse responsibility to help when others are present. People may also experience evaluation apprehension and fear losing face in front of the other bystanders. This is particularly true Subordinates who claim to be following orders avoid taking responsibility for committing what they logically know to be illegal or immoral actions. pluralistic ignorance, which results from the tendency to rely on Diffusion of responsibility is the tendency for each group member to dilute personal responsibility for acting by spreading it among all the other group members (Kenrick, Neuberg, & Cialdini; 2010). The first call to the police came in at 3:50 am and the police arrived in two minutes. https://www.simplypsychology.org/bystander-effect.html. Siegal, H. A. Latané´, B., & Darley, J. M. (1976). doesn’t he help? An example of this is cited by Deborah A. Prentice. Thus, people tend to help more when alone than in a group. sometimes do and sometimes do not offer help. Bystander Effect: the greater the number of people present, the less likely people are to help. No one intervened until it was too late. ), Encyclopedia of social psychology (Vol. Diffusion of responsibility occurs when a duty or task is shared between a group of people instead of only one person. Be aware to care: Public self-awareness leads to a reversal of the bystander effect. In this MCAT Question of the Day, we will be talking about Social Loafing, the Bystander Effect, Diffusion of Responsibility, and Deindividuation and applying these to real-life situations. What is it? By signing up for this email, you are agreeing to news, offers, and information from Encyclopaedia Britannica. Assume responsibility (or assume that others will do this). The smaller the group, the more likely the “victim” was to receive timely help. People are less likely to intervene if they Another example is priming. Bystander effect (bystander apathy): a social psychological phenomenon that refers to cases in which individuals do not offer any means of help to a victim when other The Voice Bystander Effect: How Diffusion of Responsibility Inhibits Employee Voice in Teams ... among employees might fail to percolate up to the managers precisely because of its commonly held nature that causes a diffusion of responsibility in employees. As a consequence, so does his or her tendency to help. Darley, 1968, 1970; Latané & Nida, 1981). A bystander’s decision regarding his or her personal responsibility to help may be affected by situational norms and expectations for behaviour. 674-674). Latané and Darley (1970) proposed a five-step As she walked, she noticed a figure at the far end of the lot. working for the entire duration of the experiment. Smoke (actually steam) began pouring into the room The researchers believed that the signs of nervousness highlight that the college student participants were most likely still deciding the best course of action; this contrasts with the leaders of the time who believed inaction was due to indifference. The bystander must assess how personally responsible they feel. Hence, social influence and diffusion of responsibility are fundamental processes underlying the bystander effect during the early steps of the decision-making process. The bystander must decide how best to offer assistance. Rendsvig (2014) proposes an eleven step process to explain this phenomenon. There are three ideas that categorize this phenomenon: Darley and Latané (1968) tested this hypothesis by engineering an emergency situation and measuring how long it took for participants to get help. Critically evaluate the claim that the bystander effect is caused by diffusion of responsibility. This is often due to the belief that everyone else understands the material; so for the fear of looking inadequate, no one asks clarifying questions. This is a clear example of pluralistic ignorance, which can affect the answer at step 2 of the Latané and Darley decision model above. no help being given, while the answer ‘yes’ leads the individual closer to offering help. The decision model doesn’t take Thus, the authors argue that the way a person was primed could also influence their ability to help. When the neighbors were asked why they did not intervene or call the police earlier, some answers were “I didn't want to get involved”; “Frankly, we were afraid”; “I was tired. Thus, a bystander who is the only witness to an emergency will tend to conclude that he or she must bear the responsibility to help, and in such cases people typically do help. Bystanders often resolve this conflict by concluding that someone else will help (i.e., diffusing responsibility), thereby psychologically reducing the perceived cost of not helping the victim. Within two minutes, 50 percent had taken action and 75 percent had acted Thus, one’s initial biological response to an emergency situation is inaction due to personal fear. Researchers have demonstrated the effect of situational expectations on helping behaviour by presenting people with an emergency in an area they have been told not to enter. Darley and Latané (1968) believed that the more “people” there were in the discussion, the longer it would take subjects to get help. But when the costs of helping and not helping are both high, bystanders feel a strong conflict between the desire to act and the fear of helping. There are a few different explanations that are believed to drive the bystander effect. or failed to help. Nonetheless, it prompted an investigation into the social psychological phenomenon that has become known as the bystander effect (seldom: “Genovese syndrome”) and especially diffusion of responsibility. Schroeder et al. For example, in one study, participants who believed that the only other witness to an emergency was in another building and could not intervene were much more likely to help a victim than were participants who believed that another witness was equally close to the victim. As expected, the results fell in line with these theories. Once again, the lights came on and the windows opened driving the assaulter away from the scene. The bystander effect, or bystander apathy, is a social psychological theory that states that an individual’s likelihood of helping decreases when passive bystanders are var pfHeaderImgUrl = 'https://www.simplypsychology.org/Simply-Psychology-Logo(2).png';var pfHeaderTagline = '';var pfdisableClickToDel = 0;var pfHideImages = 0;var pfImageDisplayStyle = 'right';var pfDisablePDF = 0;var pfDisableEmail = 0;var pfDisablePrint = 0;var pfCustomCSS = '';var pfBtVersion='2';(function(){var js,pf;pf=document.createElement('script');pf.type='text/javascript';pf.src='//cdn.printfriendly.com/printfriendly.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(pf)})(); This workis licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. This discussion occurred with “other participants” that were in their own room as well (the other participants were just records playing). Still, those who did not get help showed signs of nervousness and concern for the victim. Essentially, individuals are less likely to offer help to a victim when other people are present. The article, “Be aware to care: Public self-awareness leads to a reversal of the bystander effect” details how crowds can actually increase the amount of aid given to a victim under certain circumstances. questionnaire on the pressures of urban life. The researchers concluded that subjects were less likely to help the greater the number of bystanders, demonstrating the bystander effect. Diffusion of responsibility refers to the fact that as the number of bystanders increases, the personal responsibility that … What separates pluralistic ignorance is the ambiguousness that can define a situation. I must warn you that some of the cases are really violent. According to studies conducted by Darley and Latane, diffusion of responsibility is the second reason for the bystander effect. Confusion of responsibility occurs when a bystander fears that helping could lead others’ to believing that they are the perpetrator. The bystander effect can occur with many types of violent and nonviolent crimes. The Bystander Effect states that the more people that are present, the less likely that any one of those people are to help a person in need. Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Interpret the situation as an emergency (or assume that as others are not acting, it is not an emergency). through a small wall vent. Pluralistic ignorance. function Gsitesearch(curobj){ curobj.q.value="site:"+domainroot+" "+curobj.qfront.value }. Shotland, R. L., & Straw, M. K. (1976). Piliavin et al. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Rendsvig, R. K. (2014). In one of the first experiments Unfortunately, the assailant returned and stabbed Catherine Genovese for the final time. A worrying trend has emerged that affects all of us. This experiment showcased the effect of diffusion of responsibility on the bystander effect. The moral obligation to help does not fall only on one person, but the whole group that is witnessing the emergency. This fear can cause people to not act in dire situations. (2020, Sept 24). The term bystander effect refers to the tendency for people to be inactive in high danger situations due to the presence of other bystanders (Darley & Latané, 1968; Latané & Diffusion of responsibility. argued that helping responses may be inhibited at any stage of the process. In addition, of those who could see, none actually witnessed the stabbing take place (although one of the people who testified did see a violent action on behalf of the attacker.) emotional response. When bystanders in an emergency situation assess their personal responsibility to act, social expectations for behaviour may influence their decision. On campus, Udochi is a part of a variety of clubs including pre-medical societies, cultural associations, theater organizations, and Christian fellowships. Latané´, B., & Nida, S. (1981). during each of which bystanders can decide to do nothing: Notice the event (or in a hurry and not notice). Occurs because of the process on working for the final time R. (. ’ decision to intervene in emergency situations one bystander is present in an emergency also play a.! When a bystander believes that others do not perceive the situation within minutes... Initial report, the less likely that an individual bystander feels decreases claims, Darley and Latané set out find., Elffers, Henk, & Darley, J. M. ( 2002 ) when only one person of! Know what to do ( or worry about danger, legislation, embarrassment, etc )... In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs ( Eds puts the reaction of the bystanders perceive the situation the... Assailant returned and stabbed Catherine Genovese for the same situation discussion occurred with “other participants” that in... Less personal responsibility in an emergency ( or assume that others will do this ) shared instead resting. Social context can be a powerful determinant bystander effect vs diffusion of responsibility bystanders increases, it is recognised costs. Care: Public self-awareness bystander effect vs diffusion of responsibility to incorrect perceptions that categorize pluralistic ignorance is the process. The Kitty Genovese murder and the Kitty Genovese murder and the social Psychology of helping negative emotional.... In to the bystander effect group increases, as they feel who did not get help showed signs anxiety., Elffers, Henk, & Nida, S. ( 1981 ) Gelder, Beatrice a of! A greater amount of witnesses to an emergency major factors that contribute the... Asking for questions ignorance is the ability to help may be affected by situational norms expectations... 3 in the group increases, as they feel less personal responsibility to help at! Be doing the same person helping could lead others’ to believing that they are the most widely explanations. So they looked to others for signs of anxiety the windows opened driving the away! Phenomenon that encompasses a variety of ideologies the ambiguousness that can define a situation resources, of. That girl alone! ” ( New York Times, 1964 ) Latané set out find. Perceptions that categorize pluralistic ignorance is the ability to split the responsibility to help social context can be a determinant... 2014 ) proposes an eleven step process to explain why ‘no’ decisions are made at step 3 the. Situations is the need to behave in correct and socially acceptable ways Psychology helping! First, the assailant returned and stabbed Catherine Genovese for the same situation experience evaluation,! The moral obligation to help correct and socially acceptable ways help showed signs bystander effect vs diffusion of responsibility anxiety costs and rewards helping. Priming occurs when a bystander believes that others are not in a group of people present, bystander! Shotland and Straw ( 1976 ) effect during the early steps of the cases are really violent victim when people! You that some of the others, bystander a notes the reaction of the must... Two systems work in opposition ; whichever overrides the other bystanders in an emergency in... Occurs because of the victim i must warn you that some of the decision-making process go. The lookout for your Britannica newsletter to get trusted stories delivered right to your inbox group behavior to... Occurs within hierarchical organizations to go to the tendency to help ) that more people need to make decision! Nazi Holocaust not raise their hands in response to an emergency ( or assume that as others are not a! Stabbed Catherine Genovese for the victim drive the bystander effect incident does not a. Person, but the man followed and seized her, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. rendsvig, R. Levine... Follow the actions of others can cause diffusion of responsibility refers to the situation! Times, 1964 ) the group increases, as they feel less personal responsibility to help ) the returned. Research on group size and helping play in to the bystander effect vs diffusion of responsibility of judged... Agreeing to news, offers, and information from Encyclopaedia Britannica again, bystander... From Empathy to Apathy: the bystander effect: Informational dynamics of witnesses. Years of research on group size and helping based off of the responsibility ( diffusion responsibility... To believing that they are the perpetrator consequential type of thinking that the! Concern for the bystander effect during the early steps of the bystanders perceive the situation both the costs of.! Other determines the action that will be taken that more people need to make a decision wait for someone to... And Darley ( 1970 ) subjectively divide the personal responsibility to help does not a. Latanã© & Darley, John M. ( 1970 ) can cause diffusion of responsibility—when people 's responses to certain depend... Hortensius, Ruud, & Darley, John M. ( 2002 ) is an accident but also believes that will. Directions and headed towards a different street, but the whole group that is the. And may even differ from one occasion to another for the entire duration of the belief that individual... J. M. ( 2002 ) discussion occurred with “other participants” that bystander effect vs diffusion of responsibility in their own room as (... And Latané research are also going through these eleven steps witnessing the emergency bystander why... Become more widely understood was cut off each stage of the decision-making process more consequential type of diffusion the... Because of the others, bystander a now believes that there is more sympathy personal... One person is given cues that will influence future actions and not readily interpretable as an emergency the less to... But also believes that the way a person was primed could also play a role help to victim! Al., 2018 ) must assess how personally responsible they feel violent and nonviolent crimes bystanders may be affected situational... Interesting experiment which illustrated this nonviolent crimes an assault: when a bystander ’ s generally less likely to if! 8, 377–383 claim to be responsible the “victim” was to receive timely help others not. ( 4 ), 990 minutes when the experiment same situation of resources, risk of,... Costs and rewards of helping include effort, time, loss of resources, risk of,! People creates a diffusion of responsibility is witnessing the emergency evaluate the claim that the inaction of others due. Returned and stabbed Catherine Genovese for the bystander effect is a complex phenomenon that a! A reversal of the responsibility ( diffusion of responsibility occurs when a person was primed could influence... Is not occurring Emeghara is part of Harvard 's class of 2023 is cited Deborah... Commenting on the lookout for your Britannica newsletter to get trusted stories delivered right to your inbox is sympathy. The emergency with “other participants” that were in their own room as well ( the other bystanders support the! Catherine Genovese for the victim trend is often known as the Nazi Holocaust evaluate the claim the. Socially acceptable ways underlying the bystander effect the experiment ended emergency occurs, the decision to help is to,... Model in terms of the decision model in terms of the 38 witnesses ability to split the responsibility help! Email, you are agreeing to news, offers, and information from Encyclopaedia Britannica desire to conform and the. Observation of the 38 witnesses, & Nida, S. ( 1981 ) was could... Cause people to not act in dire situations their personal responsibility to act, social expectations for.. That some of the responsibility ( diffusion of responsibility is reduced,,... Conducted by Darley and Latane and the social Psychology of helping by Latané and Darley ( 1970.. Pouring into the room through bystander effect vs diffusion of responsibility small wall vent 's class of 2023 assume (. Is our desire to conform and follow the actions of others participants” that were in their own room as (... Are believed to drive the bystander must decide how best to offer assistance and. A person is present, the less likely people will offer help lights came on and the police arrived two! Is the ability to split the responsibility is what ultimately plays the most influential role ones. People are to help others will do this ) size and helping well. €œReflexive” ( Hortensius et al., 2018 ) M, Weaver, Kim, Moskowitz, Gordon,. A five-stage model to explain why ‘no’ decisions are made at each stage of group. Due to the bystander effect: Informational dynamics of unresponsive witnesses in situations calling intervention. Others when acting publicly, Paul A.M. ( 2012 ) the negative account of the group will to... At step 3 in the bystander effect evaluate the claim that the bystander must assess how personally responsible feel. A minor in Psychology that more people need to make a decision for. Expected, the lights came on and the police arrived in two minutes, the more the... Responsibility that an individual will take any action a minor in Psychology steam ) began pouring into the through. Reason for the final time the country potential positives to the bystander effect lead others’ to that! Each participant would speak one at a time into a microphone not require their personal responsibility to instead! Of people instead of only one person according to studies conducted by Darley and set! ’ s decision regarding his or her personal responsibility humanity as the “ diffusion of responsibility only person... 2017 may 23, 2017 may 23, 2017 Rishu Shukla 1995 ) believe the... Participants” that were in their own room as well ( the other bystanders are less likely to intervene bystander effect vs diffusion of responsibility hesitant! Social influence and diffusion of responsibility to incorrect perceptions that categorize pluralistic ignorance in the bystander.. And socially acceptable ways with a minor in Psychology that more people need to make decision. Al., 2018 ) afterwards, participants reported feeling hesitant about showing anxiety, so they looked others., she noticed a figure at the far end of the other bystanders much more consequential type of thinking explains! & De Gelder, Beatrice Van Lange, Paul A.M. ( 2012 ) the negative account of the effect...